Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  6 / 116 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 6 / 116 Next Page
Page Background

IT IS A GREAT HONOUR

TO HAVE BECOME THE

CHAIRMAN OF ARTC.

IN THAT SPIRIT, AND

ON BEHALF OF THE

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

AND MANAGEMENT

TEAM, I AM PLEASED TO

PRESENT OUR ANNUAL

REPORT FOR FY2016.

This year, ARTC produced a strong

underlying profit, despite challenging

market conditions. Following this result,

the total dividend paid for the year

to the Shareholders was $91.3 million,

an increase of 59 percent over the

prior year. We are pleased to deliver

such a satisfactory outcome for

our Shareholders.

ARTC’s commitment is to put our

customers at the centre of all we do,

while delivering value for Shareholders.

This has led our leadership team to

continue to focus our transformation

program on the quality of the customer

experience; our own effectiveness and

efficiency; as well as the safety of our

staff, customers and the community.

ARTC recognises the critical role we play

in the transport supply chain. We will

continue to work hard to make rail the

preferred mode for transporting freight.

During the year we also welcomed

the opportunity to participate in

the Government’s Scoping Study,

culminating in the May 2016 Budget

announcement where the Australian

Government advised it had decided to

retain ownership in ARTC and leverage

our capability to help deliver Inland Rail.

The Board and management are now

working proactively and constructively

with our Shareholders on the new body

of work for the Inland Rail Programme

which includes market testing to optimise

private sector involvement in the delivery

and financing of Inland Rail. ARTC is

pleased to be actively involved in this

process and is committed to a fact-based

and rigorous process that ensures the

best outcome is delivered for customers,

the community and our Shareholders.

Financial Results

ARTC’s reported Net Profit after

Tax (NPAT) of $117.6 million, while

lower than the prior year, included an

unfavourable post-tax adjustment of

effectively $48.7 million relating to prior

years. This adjustment arose from the

Australian Competition and Consumer

Commission’s (ACCC) 2013 review of

the cost allocation methodology used

for Zone 1 and Zone 3 coal producers

in the Hunter Valley, which was

CHAIRMAN’S

OVERVIEW

4